Modern corporate culture is in the middle of a quiet identity shift, with flexible schedules, hybrid arrangements and the rise of flexible office space in London challenging when work should happen.
Technology has made it easier than ever to stay connected; emails don’t care that it’s 10pm and messages arrive whenever clients press ‘send’. For many employees, this raises a pressing question: should people monitor their work and respond to clients outside their contracted hours?
This debate has become even more relevant following a new Labour concept; the right to disconnect could influence how every business manages communication expectations. For owners and HR managers, it’s important to understand how to balance healthy employee boundaries with maintaining all-important client satisfaction.
The blur between work and home
Over the past decade, smartphones, cloud platforms and collaboration apps have fundamentally altered workplace rhythms. Many people effectively carry their office in their pocket, which can make creating boundaries at work more challenging than ever before. The convenience of modern technology can turn into an expectation of out of hours working, with people feeling compelled to stay connected even at home.
However, research shows that when the line between personal and professional life disappears, wellbeing suffers. The UK’s Working Time Regulations 1998 were introduced specifically to limit this crossover, providing rules around maximum working hours and minimum rest periods.
Additionally, ACAS guidance states that on-call requirements must be ‘explicit’ and not merely implied, setting clear boundaries for employees. Despite the law, in many organisations, the expectation to be reachable remains informal and unspoken.
Should employees monitor their work out of hours?
The truth is there’s no single right answer. When considering how to improve work efficiency, not all roles require the same level of responsiveness. Industries operate across many different schedules, and importantly, all employees don’t want or need the same level of flexibility.
Some organisations encourage responsiveness because it improves workflow, especially in client-facing industries. A quick acknowledgement of a query at 7pm may prevent an issue from snowballing. It may also strengthen trust, recognising the importance of client satisfaction, especially when working with international contacts in different time zones. In this sense, occasional out-of-hours engagement can be a strategic business advantage.
However, there are also risks. The ‘always on call’ pressure can lead to faster burnout, lower productivity and greater resentment among employees who feel their personal time is being eroded. When one team member responds instantly at night, others may feel they need to keep up. Over time, this can create an unfair expectation or working culture without any formal discussion or agreement.
Many businesses using London office space believe a clear, structured environment helps staff to separate work and home more effectively. Even in offices with 24/7 access, the psychological separation of leaving a workspace and travelling home helps people maintain healthier boundaries.
Giving teams a defined environment that’s separate from home, yet flexible, means businesses can establish clearer norms. Staff come into work, focus, complete their duties and then leave the office knowing they’re genuinely off duty, unless they’ve explicitly agreed to on-call arrangements.
The right to disconnect in the UK
The concept of the right to disconnect has grown across Europe. France introduced rules years ago, with penalties for non-compliance that can reach £3,300 and even involve prison sentences for senior managers. Ireland and the Netherlands have also adopted similar frameworks, although without sanctions.
In the UK, the Labour government has announced that the right to disconnect will form part of the upcoming Employment Rights Bill, potentially implemented by the end of 2026. Early indications suggest that rather than strict, enforceable laws, the UK approach may involve a code of practice, giving businesses guidance, but also flexibility. This would allow organisations to craft policies suited to their needs. For example, executive roles may legitimately require some out-of-hours availability, and this could be written into contracts. Meanwhile, employees with flexible schedules may receive communication outside their working hours, but employers can emphasise that no response is required until they are next on duty.
Notably, much of the UK discussion focuses on office workers. There has been less consideration for hospitality, emergency services or industries where overtime is essential. Future policy will need to strike a balance between fairness, practicality and economic reality.
Implications for employers
Few managers explicitly tell staff to respond at night, but the implicit expectation can still cause strain. A defined right to switch off could lead to happier, healthier teams who perform better over the long term. Proactively setting boundaries, defining emergencies and clarifying response expectations can help organisations reduce confusion and strengthen working relationships.
Flexible office space supports this clarity, encouraging employees to treat the workspace as a professional environment and reducing the temptation to let work seep into leisure time. However, should certain tasks require a later finish one evening, this can be offset by starting work later the next morning.
Impact on employees
Working from home, especially full-time, has amplified the challenge of switching off. Without physical separation, many employees drift into late-night email checking simply because their laptop is within reach. Over time, this increases stress and reduces wellbeing, ultimately harming the business as much as the individual.
A successful right to disconnect allows people to step away from work fully. It gives families more time together, supports mental health and ensures people return to work refreshed and more productive.
Is a 9am to 5pm rule workable?
Bosses enforcing a strict 9-5, requiring employees to leave exactly on time, can create end-of-day anxiety and limit flexibility. While clear boundaries help separate work and homelife, balance between structure and flexibility is key. Managers who “obsess” over office hours are clinging to outdated practices that often fail. Keeping staff “chained to their desks” leads to exhausted, frustrated employees, stifling creativity.
With the right to disconnect approaching, employers should review habits: are employees contacted out of hours unnecessarily? Are expectations about availability discussed or assumed? Are managers modelling healthy boundaries?
Practical steps might include clearer email guidelines, scheduled sending and even contract reviews. It’s important to give employees a workspace they can leave behind at the end of the day, without impacting operational efficiency. In doing so, employers can create modern, sustainable working cultures that will benefit both people and productivity.
© vk_st / Shutterstock.com & © StockLite / Shutterstock.com
